Consuming the Congo: War and Conflict Minerals in the World’s Deadliest Place by Peter Eichstaedt
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
There has increasingly been more attention paid to conflict minerals – the minerals that are extracted from mainly developing countries – that are used to power the technology we all cannot live without. These minerals cause problems for a great many of us. We cannot go a day or even a few hours without our cell phones, tablets, and laptops even though we realize that the minerals inside of them most likely caused suffering for some African miner working to earn very little wages. With every social media update and email we send it seems we don’t care, but conflict minerals put us into an unimaginable bind. Whereas the great many of us can go without buying conflict diamonds none of us can seriously go without our technology. Therein lies the rub.
Celebrities, activists, and humanitarians shout from the rooftops about conflict minerals and how multinationals are grabbing mines at breakneck speeds to claim the riches beneath the earth. But no one is taking the next step and doing away with their technology to take a stand against the minerals that today cause undue hardship for so many. We remain largely nonplussed. It’s not that most of us don’t care, it’s that we don’t understand the history of it all and the devastation surrounding conflict minerals. It’s a “them” problem, not ours.
That is why Consuming the Congo: War and Conflict Minerals in the World’s Deadliest Place is so important to this global dialogue. Instead of the problem being simplified into soundbites, the history and repercussions of conflict minerals in the DRC is laid out in great detail by veteran journalist and Africa editor of the Institute of War and Peace Reporting at the Hague, Peter Eichstaedt. In reading Consuming the Congo you get an overwhelming sense that it’s not Eichstaedt’s first time at the rodeo. He already has great knowledge of the history of the region, but also has excellent resources who are not afraid to talk to him and provide inside information about the goings-on of the area and provide insight about who is fighting whom. It is a difficult task to undergo, to be sure: putting the pieces together for an audience that largely couldn’t point the Congo out on a map.
Eichstaedt makes the narrative easy to follow and the history relatively easy to comprehend although the actors are so rife it’s hard to keep up with who is who. Perhaps some of the bit players could have been left out of the narrative, but I have a feeling the story would be left rather incomplete and the book would grow holes that would grow larger as history goes on. Every bit person counts. Every militia and rebel group counts. Every multinational country counts and every country that is vying for supremacy over the region counts, even though for the reader it can become tedious.
Eichstaedt does, however, a masterful job explaining why conflict minerals exist and why they are so extremely valuable. We know it is because they are essential to every electronic device on the planet, but he does a great job of explaining the why. He also does a masterful job at describing how the rush for conflict minerals is negatively affecting the people and the terrain of the Democratic Republic of Congo while nothing seems to be getting better.
Consuming the Congo is essential reading for those who want to get to the bottom of the conflict minerals debate and see why it really is important as consumers to fight for nonconflict minerals. However, the book is also quite disturbing because it seems no one is doing anything about the suffering. It just goes on while we fire up our devices and seemingly don’t care.
** Update: As noted today in Fast Company’s Fast Coexist starting now all Intel microprocessors will be conflict-free.
8 thoughts on “Book Review: Consuming the Congo: War and Conflict Minerals in the World’s Deadliest Place”
Convinced. I’ll pick it up.
Great! Thnks for the comment. You’ll enjoy the book.
Will be looking for this at the library!
Fantastic! It’s a wonderful read!
Showing her complete ignorance on the subject, the reviewer writes:
“Eichstaedt does, however, a masterful job explaining why conflict diamonds exist and why they are so extremely valuable. We know it is because they are essential to every electronic device on the planet, but he does a great job of explaining the why. He also does a masterful job at describing how the rush for conflict diamonds is negatively affecting the people and the terrain of the Democratic Republic of Congo while nothing seems to be getting better.”
The problem: she is conflating two completely separate issues; conflict diamonds (AKA “Blood Diamonds”) have absolutely nothing to do with electronics manufacturing. The Conflict Minerals (Dodd-Frank Law, Sec. 1502) deals with tin, tungsten, tantalum, and gold, which ARE used in electronics manufacturing. These same minerals are also quite fungible, making genuine trace-ability to conflict-free smelters a joke. Ship them through Uganda or other neighboring countries, Trans-ship through China (which is not bound by Dodd-Frank), and the avowed source is meaningless. Sorry to pop your bubble.
Thank you for catching that. It was meant to say conflict “minerals” – not diamonds. I do realize diamonds aren’t used in electronic devices, just a typing error. Thank you for reading.
I apologize for my earlier caustic language. It’s just that I tire of all the political press stressing how good this law is, without any apparent understanding of the huge cost on small businesses (due to the publicly-traded customers demanding extremely costly source research for all items purchased). They demand the research, but won’t pay for it. This is killing small distribution, with negligible effect (I believe) on the actual on-the-ground problem in DRC.
I find it such a shocking problem. There are so many products in the world we consume that are being unfairly made. I think of the child trafficking for chocolate and the sweat shops for our clothing. The list goes on and I find it overwhelming. I wish companies would be more ethical about the ingredients inside their products. I would love to read this book!